- SPEC §1 component table: add chatd row marked DONE; replaces
Rust gateway's v1::ollama_cloud / openrouter / opencode adapters
+ the aibridge crate.
- SPEC §3.9 — chatd shipped: 5-provider routing (ollama, ollama_cloud,
openrouter, opencode, kimi) by model-name prefix or :cloud suffix.
Captures the Anthropic 4.7 temperature-deprecation quirk + the
local-Ollama think=false default that the playbook_lift judge
needed. Mentions scrum_review.sh as the reusable cross-lineage
vehicle eating chatd's own /v1/chat.
- SPEC §3.10 — local-review-harness sibling tool: separate repo at
git.agentview.dev/profit/local-review-harness, MVP shipped today.
Documents the cross-pollination plan for when both substrates
stabilize (chatd as the harness's LLM backend; harness findings
as Lakehouse pathway-memory drift signal; .memory/known-risks
as a matrix corpus). Explicit "don't re-port" so future Claudes
don't try to absorb the harness into Lakehouse.
- STATE_OF_PLAY.md: SIBLING TOOLS section with 1-line summary
+ pointer to SPEC §3.10.
No code changes. just verify still PASS — touched only docs.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Per the 2026-04-29 scope-discipline pause: the wave shipped four
pieces beyond SPEC §3.4 component scope, and one architectural
pattern surfaced (Archon-style multi-pass workflow runner) that's
the observer's natural growth path. Document them as port targets
so the next scrum review has authoritative SPEC components.
§3.5 — Drift quantification (loop 5 of the PRD)
Names the SCORER drift work shipped in be65f85 + the deferred
shapes (PLAYBOOK drift, EMBEDDING drift, AUDIT BASELINE drift).
Acceptance gates G3.5.A–B.
§3.6 — Staffing-side structured filter
Names the metadata-filter MVP shipped in b199093 + the deferred
pre-retrieval SQL gate via queryd. Acceptance gates G3.6.A–C.
§3.7 — Operational rating wiring
Names the bulk playbook-record endpoint shipped in 6392772 + the
deferred UI shim, negative-feedback path, and time-decay.
Acceptance gates G3.7.A–B.
§3.8 — Observer-KB workflow runner (Archon-style multi-pass) —
PORT TARGET, not yet started
Documents the architecture J was working on across the Rust
observer-kb branch (10 commits ahead of main, never merged) and
the local Archon mod (committed 2026-04-29 as 3f2afc8 in
/home/profit/external/Archon, not pushed to coleam00/Archon).
The pattern: multi-pass mode chain (extract → validator →
hallucination → consensus → redteam → pipeline → render) where
each pass is a deterministic measurement. The observer is the
natural home — workflows ARE observation patterns whose every
step is recorded. Five components in dependency order: workflow
definition (YAML), node executor (DAG runner), provenance
recording (ObservedOps), mode catalog (matrix.search,
distillation.score, drift.scorer, llm.chat), HTTP surface
(/v1/observer/workflow/run).
Reference materials on the system (preserved, not lost):
- /home/profit/lakehouse/.archon/workflows/lakehouse-architect-review.yaml
(Rust main, 69919d9) — 3-node Archon-via-Lakehouse proof
- /home/profit/external/Archon dev branch — upstream engine
with local pi/provider.ts mod (3f2afc8) for Lakehouse routing
- Rust observer-kb branch — apps/observer-kb/docs/PRD.md +
Python prototypes proven on real ChatGPT/Claude PDF data
Acceptance gates G3.8.A–D. Estimated effort: L.
PRD updated with "Observer as system resource (clarified
2026-04-29)" section pointing at §3.8 as the architectural growth
path. The bare-bones observerd in bc9ab93 is the substrate; the
workflow runner is what makes it the "objective measurement engine"
the small-model pipeline needs.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Adds matrix indexer as its own row in the §1 component table and a
new §3.4 with port plan. Distinct from vectord (substrate); lives at
internal/matrix/ + gateway /v1/matrix/*.
Five components in dependency order: corpus builders → multi-corpus
retrieve+merge → relevance filter → strong-model downgrade gate →
learning-loop integration.
Locks in the framing J flagged 2026-04-29: in Rust the matrix indexer
was emergent across mode.rs + build_*_corpus.ts + observer /relevance,
and earlier port-planning reduced it to "we have vectord." The SPEC
now names it explicitly so the port preserves the multi-corpus
retrieval shape AND the learning loop, not just the HNSW substrate.
Sharding-by-id was investigated as a throughput fix and rejected —
corpus-as-shard at the matrix layer is the existing retrieval shape
and parallelizes Adds for free.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Pre-Phase-G0 research sweep against current Go ecosystem state. Three
upstream changes that the day-of SPEC missed:
1. DuckDB Go binding ownership transferred. marcboeker/go-duckdb is
deprecated as of v2.5.0 — official maintainer is now
github.com/duckdb/duckdb-go/v2 (DuckDB team + Marc Boeker joint
hand-off). Current v2.10502.0 / DuckDB v1.5.2. SPEC §3.1 +
component table updated.
2. Official Go MCP SDK exists. Switching from mark3labs/mcp-go
(community) to github.com/modelcontextprotocol/go-sdk (official,
Google collaboration, v1.5.0 stable, 4.4k stars, targets MCP spec
2025-11-25). Component table updated.
3. arrow-go is on v18, not v15. v18.5.2 (March 2026) has parquet
encryption fixes relevant for PII-masked safe views. PRD locked
stack + SPEC component table updated.
Validated unchanged: coder/hnsw (220 stars, active), chi (still the
clean-architecture pick over fiber/gin/echo).
Surfaced for future use: anthropics/anthropic-sdk-go (official,
available for direct Claude calls bypassing opencode if ever needed),
duckdb-wasm (browser-side analytics future option), IVF as HNSW
fallback if recall gate fails.
See docs/RESEARCH_LOG_2026-04-28.md for full survey + sources.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Two documents only — no Go code yet. PRD restates the problem and
preserves the Rust PRD's invariants verbatim, then maps the locked
stack to Go libraries and surfaces four hard problems (DuckDB-via-cgo
for the query engine, Lance dropped, Dioxus → HTMX, arrow-go maturity).
SPEC walks each Rust crate + TS surface and tags the port with library
choice / effort estimate / risk + a 5-phase migration plan from
skeleton (Phase G0) to demo parity (Phase G5).
Six open questions remain that gate Phase G0:
- DuckDB cgo OK?
- HTMX vs React for the UI?
- Repo location?
- Distillation v1.0.0 port verbatim or rebuild?
- Pathway memory data — port 88 traces or start clean?
- Auditor lineage — port audit_baselines.jsonl or restart?
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
