Phase 3 ask: real-world inbox-style event injection during the stress
test. Coordinators in production receive emails + SMS that trigger
contract responses; the substrate has to RECORD these signals AND
react with a search using the embedded demand. This commit lands the
endpoint and exercises it end-to-end in the stress harness.
observerd surface:
- New POST /observer/inbox route — accepts {type, sender, subject,
body, priority, tag} and records as ObservedOp with
Source=SourceInbox. Type must be email|sms; body required;
priority defaults to medium. The handler ONLY records — downstream
triggers (search, ingest, etc.) are the caller's concern, recorded
separately. Keeps the witness role pure.
- New observer.SourceInbox = "inbox" alongside SourceMCP /
SourceScenario / SourceWorkflow.
- Three contract tests on the new route (happy path / bad type / empty
body), router-mount test extended, all green.
Stress harness phase 1c (Hour 9):
- 6 inbox events fire in priority order (urgent → high → medium):
2 urgent emails (forklift Cleveland, production Indianapolis)
1 high email (crane Chicago)
1 high sms (bilingual safety Indianapolis)
1 medium sms (drone Chicago)
1 medium email (warehouse Milwaukee FYI)
- Each event:
1. POSTs to /v1/observer/inbox (recorded by observerd)
2. Triggers matrix.search using a parsed demand (the demand
extraction is hard-coded for now; production needs a small
LLM to parse from body)
3. Captures both as events in the run JSON
Run #006 result (with v2-moe embedder + all phases including inbox):
Diversity:
Same-role-across-contracts Jaccard = 0.000 (n=9)
Different-roles-same-contract Jaccard = 0.046 (n=18)
Determinism: 1.000
Verbatim handover: 4/4 (100%)
Paraphrase handover: 4/4 (100%)
Inbox burst:
6/6 events accepted by observerd (200 status, all recorded)
6/6 triggered searches produced distinct top-1 worker IDs
distance distribution: 0.24 (Indy production) → 0.71 (Chicago
drone surveyor — honest stretch since drones aren't in the
5K-worker corpus, system surfaces closest neighbor at high
distance rather than fabricating)
The drone-Chicago case is the architectural-honesty signal: when
the demand asks for a specialist NOT in the roster, the system
returns the closest semantic neighbor with a distance that flags
"this is a stretch." Coordinators reading distances see "we don't
have a great match here" rather than a confident wrong answer.
Total events captured: 67 (was 61 pre-inbox).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
230 lines
8.0 KiB
Go
230 lines
8.0 KiB
Go
package main
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"bytes"
|
|
"net/http"
|
|
"net/http/httptest"
|
|
"strings"
|
|
"testing"
|
|
"time"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/go-chi/chi/v5"
|
|
|
|
"git.agentview.dev/profit/golangLAKEHOUSE/internal/observer"
|
|
"git.agentview.dev/profit/golangLAKEHOUSE/internal/workflow"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
// newTestRouter builds the observerd router with an in-memory store
|
|
// and a workflow runner with no modes registered. Closes R-005 for
|
|
// observerd.
|
|
//
|
|
// Returns chi.Router (not http.Handler) so chi.Walk works without a
|
|
// type assertion that would panic if a future refactor wraps the
|
|
// router in plain net/http middleware.
|
|
func newTestRouter(t *testing.T) chi.Router {
|
|
t.Helper()
|
|
h := &handlers{
|
|
store: observer.NewStore(nil),
|
|
runner: workflow.NewRunner(),
|
|
}
|
|
r := chi.NewRouter()
|
|
h.register(r)
|
|
return r
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestRoutesMounted(t *testing.T) {
|
|
r := newTestRouter(t)
|
|
want := map[string]bool{
|
|
"GET /observer/stats": false,
|
|
"POST /observer/event": false,
|
|
"POST /observer/workflow/run": false,
|
|
"GET /observer/workflow/modes": false,
|
|
"POST /observer/inbox": false,
|
|
}
|
|
_ = chi.Walk(r, func(method, route string, _ http.Handler, _ ...func(http.Handler) http.Handler) error {
|
|
key := method + " " + route
|
|
if _, ok := want[key]; ok {
|
|
want[key] = true
|
|
}
|
|
return nil
|
|
})
|
|
for k, mounted := range want {
|
|
if !mounted {
|
|
t.Errorf("route not mounted: %s", k)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestStats_GET(t *testing.T) {
|
|
r := newTestRouter(t)
|
|
req := httptest.NewRequest("GET", "/observer/stats", nil)
|
|
w := httptest.NewRecorder()
|
|
r.ServeHTTP(w, req)
|
|
if w.Code != http.StatusOK {
|
|
t.Errorf("expected 200, got %d", w.Code)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestWorkflowModes_GET(t *testing.T) {
|
|
r := newTestRouter(t)
|
|
req := httptest.NewRequest("GET", "/observer/workflow/modes", nil)
|
|
w := httptest.NewRecorder()
|
|
r.ServeHTTP(w, req)
|
|
if w.Code != http.StatusOK {
|
|
t.Errorf("expected 200, got %d", w.Code)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestEvent_InvalidOp locks the validation path: an ObservedOp with
|
|
// missing required fields must 400, not 500. Without this assertion,
|
|
// observer.ErrInvalidOp could silently slip into the 500 branch on a
|
|
// future refactor and clients would see "internal" instead of the
|
|
// actual validation error.
|
|
func TestEvent_InvalidOp(t *testing.T) {
|
|
r := newTestRouter(t)
|
|
// Empty body — no endpoint, no source — fails ObservedOp validation.
|
|
body := []byte(`{}`)
|
|
req := httptest.NewRequest("POST", "/observer/event", bytes.NewReader(body))
|
|
req.Header.Set("Content-Type", "application/json")
|
|
w := httptest.NewRecorder()
|
|
r.ServeHTTP(w, req)
|
|
if w.Code != http.StatusBadRequest {
|
|
t.Errorf("expected 400 on invalid op, got %d (body=%s)", w.Code, w.Body.String())
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestWorkflowRun_AllProvenanceRecordedPostRun proves the gap ratified
|
|
// in ADR-005 Decision 5.3: handleWorkflowRun calls runner.Run
|
|
// synchronously and only records ObservedOps from the returned
|
|
// RunResult AFTER Run completes. A crash mid-Run would lose ALL
|
|
// provenance for that workflow.
|
|
//
|
|
// The test pauses inside a node, samples observer state (must be 0),
|
|
// unblocks, then samples again (must be N). If a future commit adds
|
|
// per-node streaming (e.g. runner.NodeHook firing before Run returns),
|
|
// the first assertion fires — that's the intentional test-as-spec
|
|
// lock so the behavior change is visible in `go test` instead of
|
|
// surfacing under load.
|
|
func TestWorkflowRun_AllProvenanceRecordedPostRun(t *testing.T) {
|
|
pauseCh := make(chan struct{})
|
|
|
|
runner := workflow.NewRunner()
|
|
runner.RegisterMode("test.pause", func(_ workflow.Context, _ map[string]any) (map[string]any, error) {
|
|
<-pauseCh
|
|
return map[string]any{"unpaused": true}, nil
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
h := &handlers{
|
|
store: observer.NewStore(nil),
|
|
runner: runner,
|
|
}
|
|
r := chi.NewRouter()
|
|
h.register(r)
|
|
|
|
// Two-node serial workflow so we have something to record post-run.
|
|
body := []byte(`{"workflow":{"name":"adr_005_5_3","nodes":[
|
|
{"id":"n1","mode":"test.pause"},
|
|
{"id":"n2","mode":"test.pause","depends_on":["n1"]}
|
|
]}}`)
|
|
|
|
// Send the request in a goroutine — it'll block until pauseCh closes.
|
|
done := make(chan int)
|
|
go func() {
|
|
req := httptest.NewRequest("POST", "/observer/workflow/run", bytes.NewReader(body))
|
|
req.Header.Set("Content-Type", "application/json")
|
|
w := httptest.NewRecorder()
|
|
r.ServeHTTP(w, req)
|
|
done <- w.Code
|
|
}()
|
|
|
|
// Wait briefly for the runner to enter n1 and block on pauseCh.
|
|
// 50ms is conservative; the goroutine + chi routing + topo sort
|
|
// take well under that on this hardware.
|
|
time.Sleep(50 * time.Millisecond)
|
|
|
|
// LOCK: store MUST be empty while runner.Run is paused.
|
|
// If a future change adds streaming-record-as-each-node-finishes,
|
|
// n1's record would land here as soon as n1 returns — but n1
|
|
// hasn't returned yet (we're paused before it does), so the
|
|
// only way this assertion passes is if recording is post-run-only.
|
|
if got := h.store.Stats().Total; got != 0 {
|
|
t.Errorf("expected 0 observer ops during paused run, got %d "+
|
|
"(if non-zero, ADR-005 Decision 5.3 must be updated — recording "+
|
|
"is no longer post-run-only)", got)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Unblock all paused nodes (channel close broadcasts to all receivers).
|
|
close(pauseCh)
|
|
|
|
// Wait for the handler to return + record post-run.
|
|
if code := <-done; code != http.StatusOK {
|
|
t.Errorf("workflow run failed: HTTP %d", code)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// LOCK: store MUST have 2 ops after run completes.
|
|
if got := h.store.Stats().Total; got != 2 {
|
|
t.Errorf("expected 2 observer ops after run, got %d", got)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestInbox_AcceptsValidEmail locks the happy-path contract for the
|
|
// /observer/inbox route — accepts an email message with required
|
|
// fields, records as ObservedOp, returns 200 with ring-size.
|
|
func TestInbox_AcceptsValidEmail(t *testing.T) {
|
|
r := newTestRouter(t)
|
|
body := []byte(`{"type":"email","sender":"client@northstar.com","subject":"URGENT: 50 forklift ops","body":"Need 50 forklift operators in Cleveland OH for next week. Day shift.","priority":"urgent","tag":"alpha-surge"}`)
|
|
req := httptest.NewRequest("POST", "/observer/inbox", bytes.NewReader(body))
|
|
req.Header.Set("Content-Type", "application/json")
|
|
w := httptest.NewRecorder()
|
|
r.ServeHTTP(w, req)
|
|
if w.Code != http.StatusOK {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected 200, got %d (body=%s)", w.Code, w.Body.String())
|
|
}
|
|
if !strings.Contains(w.Body.String(), `"accepted":true`) {
|
|
t.Errorf("expected accepted=true, got %s", w.Body.String())
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestInbox_RejectsBadType locks the validation: type must be
|
|
// "email" or "sms", anything else is 400.
|
|
func TestInbox_RejectsBadType(t *testing.T) {
|
|
r := newTestRouter(t)
|
|
body := []byte(`{"type":"smoke-signal","sender":"x","body":"y","priority":"high"}`)
|
|
req := httptest.NewRequest("POST", "/observer/inbox", bytes.NewReader(body))
|
|
req.Header.Set("Content-Type", "application/json")
|
|
w := httptest.NewRecorder()
|
|
r.ServeHTTP(w, req)
|
|
if w.Code != http.StatusBadRequest {
|
|
t.Errorf("expected 400 on bad type, got %d", w.Code)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestInbox_RejectsEmptyBody locks the body-required invariant.
|
|
func TestInbox_RejectsEmptyBody(t *testing.T) {
|
|
r := newTestRouter(t)
|
|
body := []byte(`{"type":"email","sender":"x","body":"","priority":"high"}`)
|
|
req := httptest.NewRequest("POST", "/observer/inbox", bytes.NewReader(body))
|
|
req.Header.Set("Content-Type", "application/json")
|
|
w := httptest.NewRecorder()
|
|
r.ServeHTTP(w, req)
|
|
if w.Code != http.StatusBadRequest {
|
|
t.Errorf("expected 400 on empty body, got %d", w.Code)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestWorkflowRun_UnknownMode locks the 400 path on workflow definitions
|
|
// that reference modes not registered with the runner. The harness's
|
|
// reality test runs depend on this so an unknown-mode misconfiguration
|
|
// surfaces as a definition error, not a server error.
|
|
func TestWorkflowRun_UnknownMode(t *testing.T) {
|
|
r := newTestRouter(t)
|
|
body := []byte(`{"workflow":{"name":"t","nodes":[{"id":"n1","mode":"does.not.exist"}]}}`)
|
|
req := httptest.NewRequest("POST", "/observer/workflow/run", bytes.NewReader(body))
|
|
req.Header.Set("Content-Type", "application/json")
|
|
w := httptest.NewRecorder()
|
|
r.ServeHTTP(w, req)
|
|
if w.Code != http.StatusBadRequest {
|
|
t.Errorf("expected 400 on unknown mode, got %d (body=%s)", w.Code, w.Body.String())
|
|
}
|
|
}
|