4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
profit
1e00eb4472 auditor: inference temp=0, think=false — kill signature creep
9-run empirical test showed 20 of 27 audit_lessons signatures were
singletons (count=1) — the cloud producing slightly-different summary
phrasings for the SAME underlying claim on each audit, each hashing
to a fresh signature. That's the creep J flagged — not explosive,
but steady ~2 new sigs per run, unbounded over hundreds of runs.

Root cause: temperature=0.2 + think=true was letting variable prose
leak into the classification output. Fix: temp=0 (greedy sample →
identical input yields identical output on same model version),
think=false (no reasoning trace variance), max_tokens 3000→1500
(tighter bound prevents tail wander).

The compounding policy itself was validated by the 9 runs:
  - 7 recurring claims (the legitimate signals) all at conf 0.08-0.20
  - ratingSeverity() correctly held them at info (below 0.3 threshold)
  - cross-PR signal test separately confirmed conf=1.00 → sev=block

Also: LH_AUDIT_RUNS env so the test can validate with smaller N.
2026-04-22 22:09:35 -05:00
profit
9d12a814e3 auditor: kb_index aggregator + nine-consecutive empirical test
Some checks failed
lakehouse/auditor 1 blocking issue: cloud: claim not backed — "the proven escalation ladder with learning context, collects"
Phase 1 — definition-layer over append-only JSONL scratchpads.

auditor/kb_index.ts is the single shared aggregator:

  aggregate<T>(jsonlPath, { keyFn, scopeFn, checkFn, tailLimit })
      → Map<signature, {count, distinct_scopes, confidence,
                        first_seen, last_seen, representative_summary, ...}>

  ratingSeverity(agg) — confidence × count severity policy shared
    across all KB readers. Kills the "same unfixed PR inflates its
    own recurrence score" failure mode by design: confidence =
    distinct_scopes/count, so same-scope noise stays below the 0.3
    escalation threshold no matter how many times it repeats.

checkAuditLessons now routes through aggregate + ratingSeverity.
Net effect: the recurrence detector's bespoke Map/Set bookkeeping is
gone; same behavior, shared discipline, reusable by scrum/observer.

Also: symbolsExistInRepo now skips files >500KB so the audit can't
get stuck slurping a fixture.

Phase 2 — nine-consecutive audit runner.

tests/real-world/nine_consecutive_audits.ts pushes 9 empty commits,
waits for each verdict, captures the audit_lessons aggregate state
after each run, reports:

  - sig_count trajectory (should stabilize, not grow linearly)
  - max_count trajectory (same-signature repeat rate)
  - max_confidence trajectory (must stay LOW on same-PR noise)
  - verdict_stable across runs (must NOT oscillate)

This is the empirical proof that the KB compounds favorably:
noise doesn't escalate itself, and signal stays distinguishable.

Unit-tested both failure modes: same-PR × 9 repeats = conf=0.11
(info); cross-PR × 5 distinct = conf=1.00 (block). The rating
function correctly discriminates.
2026-04-22 21:49:46 -05:00
profit
f4be27a879 auditor: fix two false-positive classes from cloud inference
Some checks failed
lakehouse/auditor 1 blocking issue: cloud: claim not backed — "the proven escalation ladder with learning context, collects"
Observed on PR #8 audit (de11ac4): 7 warn findings, all from the
cloud inference check. Investigation showed two distinct bug classes
that weren't "ship bad code", they were "auditor misreads the diff":

1. Cloud flagged "X not defined in this diff / missing implementation"
   for symbols like `tailJsonl` and `stubFinding` that ARE defined —
   just not in the added lines of this diff. Fix: extract candidate
   symbols from the cloud's gap summary, grep the repo for their
   definitions (function/const/let/def/class/struct/enum/trait/fn).
   If every named symbol resolves, drop the finding; if some do,
   demote to info with the resolution in evidence.

2. Cloud flagged runtime metrics like "58 cloud calls, 306s
   end-to-end" as unbacked claims. These are empirical outputs
   from running the test, not things a static diff can prove.
   Fix: claim_parser now has an `empirical` strength class
   matching iteration counts, cloud-call counts, duration metrics,
   attempt counts, tier-count phrases. Inference drops empirical
   claims from its cloud prompt (verifiable[] subset only) and
   claim-index mapping uses verifiable[] so cloud responses still
   line up.

Added `claims_empirical` to audit metrics so the verdict is
introspectable: how many claims WERE runtime-only vs how many
are diff-verifiable?

Verified: unit tests confirm empirical classification on 5
sample commit messages; symbol resolver found both false-positive
symbols (tailJsonl + stubFinding) and correctly skipped a known-
fake symbol.
2026-04-22 21:40:03 -05:00
profit
efc7b5ac44 Auditor: dynamic + inference checks
auditor/checks/dynamic.ts — wraps runHybridFixture, maps layer
results to Findings. Placeholder-style errors (404/unimplemented/
slice N) → info; other failures → warn. Always emits a summary
finding with real numbers (shipped/placeholder phase counts + per-
layer latency). Live-tested against current stack: 2 info findings,
0 warnings — all shipped layers actually work.

auditor/checks/inference.ts — wraps the run_codereview reviewer
pattern from llm_team_ui.py, adapted for claim-vs-diff verification.
Calls /v1/chat provider=ollama_cloud model=gpt-oss:120b. Requests
strict JSON response with claim_verdicts[] and unflagged_gaps[]. A
strong claim marked "not backed" by cloud → BLOCK severity; moderate
→ warn; weak → info. Cloud-unreachable or unparseable-output → info
(never blocks on the reviewer being down).

Live-tested against PR #1 (this PR, 20 claims, 39KB diff):
  - 36.9s round-trip
  - 7 block + 23 warn + 2 info findings
  - gpt-oss:120b correctly flagged "Fully-functional auditor (tasks
    1-9 complete)" as not-backed (only 6/10 tasks done at that
    commit) — accurate catch
  - Some false positives from the original 15KB truncation threshold
    (cloud missed gitea.ts, flagged "no Gitea client present")
  - Bumped MAX_DIFF_CHARS from 15000 to 40000 to fit the full PR
    diff in context; reviewer precision improves accordingly

Tasks 5 + 6 completed. Remaining: #7 (KB query), #8 (verdict +
Gitea poster), #9 (poller), #10 (end-to-end proof), #12 (upsert
UPDATE-drops-doc_refs).
2026-04-22 03:54:18 -05:00