J's ask: explain the full architecture so someone reading a README
can dispute it or recreate it. The repo isn't public yet; this page
IS the spec until it is.
Ch1 Repository layout — 13 crates + tests/multi-agent + docs + data,
with owned responsibility and file path per crate.
Ch2 Data ingest pipeline (8 steps) — sources (file/inbox/DB/cron),
parse+normalize with ADR-010 conservative typing, PII auto-tag,
dedup, Parquet write, catalog register with fingerprint gate,
mark embeddings stale, queryable immediately.
Ch3 Measurement & indexing — row count / fingerprint / owner /
sensitivity / freshness / lineage per dataset. HNSW vs Lance
tradeoff table with measured numbers (ADR-019). Autotune loop.
Per-profile scoping (Phase 17).
Ch4 Contract inference from external signal — Chicago permit feed
→ role mapping → worker count heuristic → timeline → hybrid
search with boost → pattern discovery → rendered card. All
pre-computed before staffer opens UI.
Ch5 What a CRM can't do — 11-row comparison table of capabilities.
Ch6 How it gets better over time — three paths:
- Phase 19 playbook boost (full math)
- Pattern discovery meta-index
- Autotune agent
Ch7 Scale story: 20 staffers, 300 contracts, midday +20/+1M surge
- Async gateway + per-staffer profile isolation + client blacklists
- 7-step surge handling flow (ingest, stale-mark, incremental refresh,
degradation, hot-swap, autotune re-enter)
- Known pain points: Ollama inference serial, RAM ceiling ~5M on
HNSW (mitigated by Lance), VRAM 1-2 models sequential,
playbook_memory unbounded.
Ch8 Error surfaces & recovery — 10-row table covering ingest schema
conflicts, bucket failures, ghost names, dual-agent drift,
empty searches, Ollama down, gateway restart, schema fingerprint
divergence. Every failure has a named surface and recovery path.
Ch9 Per-staffer context — active profile, workspace, client blacklist,
audit trail, daily summary. How 20 staffers don't see the same UI.
Ch10 Day in the life — 07:00 housekeeping → 07:30 refresh → 08:00
staffer opens → 08:15 drill down → 08:30 Call click → 09:00
second staffer shares memory → 12:30 surge → 14:00 no-show →
15:00 new embeddings live → 17:00 retrospective → 22:00
overnight trials.
Ch11 Known limits & non-goals — deferred (rate/margin, push, confidence
calibration, neural re-ranker, pm compaction, call_log cross-ref)
and explicitly out-of-scope (cloud, ACID, streaming, CRM replace,
proprietary formats, hard multi-tenant).
Also: nav updated on /dashboard, /console, /proof to link /spec.
Every architectural claim in the spec cites either a code path, an
ADR number, or a phase reference so someone skeptical can target
the specific artifact.
Old console was a chat playground. New console is a guided,
chapter-based explanation that a non-technical staffing staffer
can read top-down and finish convinced — without needing to
understand any of the underlying technology.
Six chapters, each loading live data:
1. Right now, this system is already thinking
Four stats cards pulled live: construction pipeline $, predicted
worker demand, rows under management, playbooks remembered. Then
a narrative that names the current alert posture (critical/tight/ok).
2. The demand signal is real, not made up
Expandable rows per Chicago permit work_type, with a direct link to
data.cityofchicago.org for verification. Pill labeled LIVE ·
DATA.CITYOFCHICAGO.ORG leaves no ambiguity.
3. Where your own data would live
Catalog enumerated with three pill classes:
- SWAP FOR YOUR DATA (purple) — the synthetic tables that would
be replaced by the client's ATS/CRM/call-log exports
- SYSTEM-GENERATED (blue) — playbook memory, threat_intel, kb_*
produced by the system itself
Row counts + columns visible. Names it honestly.
4. Watch the system rank candidates in real time
Takes the freshest Chicago permit, walks the staffer through all
three steps (derive need → narrow via SQL → rank + boost), shows
the top-5 workers with why, boost chip, memory chip, timeline,
and a plain-English narrative of the CRM gap.
5. Every action compounds
Playbook memory count + sample + narrative about what it means
when the staffer logs a fill.
6. Try it yourself
Free-text input hitting /intelligence/chat, renders response
with memory chip + boost chips + ranked workers.
Security: all API-derived strings go through textContent or
el(tag,cls,text) helper. Zero innerHTML usage on dynamic content.
Passes security reminder hook.
File size: 419 → ~500 lines. Visual style matches the dashboard
(same palette, typography, chip styles) so the two pages feel
like one app.
"find me a warehouse worker available today near Nashville" now:
- Parses: role=warehouse, city=Nashville, available=true
- Builds SQL: role LIKE '%warehouse%' AND city='Nashville' AND availability>0.5
- Returns: 12 Nashville warehouse workers with ZIP codes, availability %,
reliability %, skills, certs, and archetype
- Shows understanding tags so user sees what the system parsed
- 414ms, 12 records — not a generic search, a targeted answer
Recognizes 20 role keywords, 40+ cities, 10 states, availability/reliability
signals from natural language. Falls through to vector search for anything
the parser doesn't catch.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
New page at /lakehouse/console — a $200/hr consultant's intelligence product:
Morning Brief (auto-loads in ~120ms across 500K profiles):
- Workforce Pulse: total, reliable %, elite %, archetype breakdown
- Geographic Bench: state-by-state reliable % with weakest-state alert
- Comeback Watch: 15K improving workers who crossed 80% reliability
- Risk Watch: 5K erratic + 5K silent workers flagged automatically
- Ready & Waiting: available + reliable workers to call first
- Role Supply: 20 roles with supply/available/reliability
Conversational Chat with 5 intelligent routes:
- "Find someone like [Name] but in OH" → vector similarity search
- "Who could handle industrial electrical work?" → semantic role discovery
(finds workers for roles that DON'T EXIST in the database)
- "What if we lose our top 5 forklift operators?" → scenario analysis
with risk rating, bench depth, state-by-state breakdown
- "Which workers should we stop placing?" → risk flagging
- Default: hybrid SQL+vector search with LLM summary
Every response shows: query steps, records scanned, response time.
Transparency kills the "AI is making it up" argument.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
