// Cloud inference check — wraps the proven run_codereview pattern
// from llm_team_ui.py (same 3-stage framing, same cloud model) to
// critique a PR's claims against its diff.
//
// Proved out 2026-04-22 via /tmp/codereview_runner.py — gpt-oss:120b
// caught a real ternary bug in auditor/fixtures/hybrid_38_40_45.ts
// that unit tests missed. This module reuses the reviewer prompt
// shape (bugs / security / performance / style / edge cases) and
// adds claim-vs-diff specific framing.
//
// Call surface: runInferenceCheck(claims, diff) → Finding[].
// Cloud latency budget: ~60s (gpt-oss:120b reviewer typically 35-50s
// with a 15KB diff + claim list).

import type { Claim, Finding } from "../types.ts";

const GATEWAY = process.env.LH_GATEWAY_URL ?? "http://localhost:3100";
const MODEL = process.env.LH_AUDITOR_REVIEW_MODEL ?? "gpt-oss:120b";
// 40KB comfortably fits gpt-oss:120b's context. PR #1 (~39KB) was
// previously truncated at 15KB causing the reviewer to miss later
// files (gitea.ts, policy.ts) and flag "no Gitea client present" as a
// block finding when the file was simply outside the truncation window.
const MAX_DIFF_CHARS = 40000;
const CALL_TIMEOUT_MS = 120_000;

export async function runInferenceCheck(claims: Claim[], diff: string): Promise<Finding[]> {
  if (claims.length === 0) {
    return [{
      check: "inference",
      severity: "info",
      summary: "no ship-claims extracted — skipping cloud inference",
      evidence: ["parser returned empty claim list; nothing to verify against cloud"],
    }];
  }

  const truncated = diff.length > MAX_DIFF_CHARS
    ? diff.slice(0, MAX_DIFF_CHARS) + `\n...[${diff.length - MAX_DIFF_CHARS} more chars truncated]`
    : diff;

  // Build the reviewer prompt in the same shape as run_codereview's
  // review stage (llm_team_ui.py:10950), adapted for claim verification:
  //   "Task: ..."
  //   "Code: ..."
  //   "Review: bugs/security/perf/style/edge. Provide corrected code."
  // We add: claim list upfront + ask for structured JSON verdict.
  const systemMsg = [
    "You review pull-request diffs against the author's own ship-claims.",
    "For each claim, decide: is it backed by actual code in the diff, or is",
    "it placeholder / aspirational / unwired?",
    "",
    "A claim is BACKED when the diff contains a real code path that delivers",
    "the claimed behavior. A claim is NOT BACKED when:",
    "  - the claim asserts functionality but the diff only adds types/fields",
    "    with no consumer",
    "  - the claim mentions tests but no test function was added",
    "  - the claim claims integration but the integration point is a stub",
    "  - the diff contains unimplemented!() / todo!() / TODO comments",
    "  - the claim says 'works end-to-end' but the diff has no end-to-end test",
    "",
    "Respond with strict JSON only. No prose before or after. Shape:",
    "{",
    '  "claim_verdicts": [',
    '    {"claim_idx": 0, "backed": false, "evidence": "short reason"}',
    "  ],",
    '  "unflagged_gaps": [',
    '    {"location": "file:line", "summary": "short description"}',
    "  ]",
    "}",
  ].join("\n");

  const userMsg = [
    `Ship-claims the author made (numbered 0..N-1):`,
    claims.map((c, i) => `  ${i}. [${c.strength}] "${c.text}" at ${c.location}`).join("\n"),
    "",
    `Diff:`,
    "```",
    truncated,
    "```",
    "",
    `For each numbered claim above, emit a claim_verdicts entry. For gaps the`,
    `author DIDN'T claim but that look like placeholder code, emit unflagged_gaps.`,
    `Strict JSON only, matching the shape described. No prose outside JSON.`,
  ].join("\n");

  let resp: Response;
  try {
    resp = await fetch(`${GATEWAY}/v1/chat`, {
      method: "POST",
      headers: { "content-type": "application/json" },
      body: JSON.stringify({
        provider: "ollama_cloud",
        model: MODEL,
        messages: [
          { role: "system", content: systemMsg },
          { role: "user", content: userMsg },
        ],
        max_tokens: 3000,
        temperature: 0.2,
        think: true, // T3 overseer should reason — JSON shape is still required
      }),
      signal: AbortSignal.timeout(CALL_TIMEOUT_MS),
    });
  } catch (e) {
    // Cloud unreachable → soft-fail. Don't block a PR because the
    // reviewer model is down. Static + dynamic + kb still run.
    return [{
      check: "inference",
      severity: "info",
      summary: "cloud inference unreachable — skipped",
      evidence: [`fetch failed: ${(e as Error).message.slice(0, 180)}`],
    }];
  }

  if (!resp.ok) {
    return [{
      check: "inference",
      severity: "info",
      summary: `cloud inference returned ${resp.status} — skipped`,
      evidence: [`body: ${(await resp.text()).slice(0, 200)}`],
    }];
  }

  const body: any = await resp.json();
  const content: string = body?.choices?.[0]?.message?.content ?? "";
  const usage = body?.usage ?? {};

  const parsed = extractJson(content);
  if (!parsed) {
    return [{
      check: "inference",
      severity: "info",
      summary: "cloud returned unparseable output — skipped",
      evidence: [
        `head: ${content.slice(0, 200)}`,
        `tokens: ${usage.total_tokens ?? "?"}`,
      ],
    }];
  }

  const findings: Finding[] = [];

  // One summary info finding so the verdict layer knows the check ran.
  findings.push({
    check: "inference",
    severity: "info",
    summary: `cloud review completed (model=${MODEL}, tokens=${usage.total_tokens ?? "?"})`,
    evidence: [
      `claim_verdicts: ${parsed.claim_verdicts?.length ?? 0}, unflagged_gaps: ${parsed.unflagged_gaps?.length ?? 0}`,
    ],
  });

  for (const v of parsed.claim_verdicts ?? []) {
    if (v?.backed === false) {
      const idx = typeof v.claim_idx === "number" ? v.claim_idx : -1;
      const claim = claims[idx];
      if (!claim) continue;
      // Strong+unbacked = BLOCK. That's the whole point of the auditor.
      const sev: Finding["severity"] = claim.strength === "strong" ? "block"
        : claim.strength === "moderate" ? "warn"
        : "info";
      findings.push({
        check: "inference",
        severity: sev,
        claim_text: claim.text,
        summary: `cloud: claim not backed — "${claim.text.slice(0, 100)}"`,
        evidence: [
          `at ${claim.location}`,
          `cloud reason: ${String(v.evidence ?? "no reason given").slice(0, 200)}`,
        ],
      });
    }
  }

  for (const g of parsed.unflagged_gaps ?? []) {
    findings.push({
      check: "inference",
      severity: "warn",
      summary: `cloud-flagged gap not in any claim: ${String(g?.summary ?? "?").slice(0, 120)}`,
      evidence: [`location: ${String(g?.location ?? "?").slice(0, 140)}`],
    });
  }

  return findings;
}

// Lift the first balanced JSON object out of the response. Tolerates
// leading prose, code fences, and model reasoning preamble when the
// cloud model ignored "strict JSON only."
function extractJson(text: string): any | null {
  const cleaned = text.replace(/^```(?:json)?\s*/im, "").replace(/```\s*$/im, "");
  let depth = 0;
  let start = -1;
  for (let i = 0; i < cleaned.length; i++) {
    const c = cleaned[i];
    if (c === "{") {
      if (depth === 0) start = i;
      depth++;
    } else if (c === "}") {
      depth--;
      if (depth === 0 && start >= 0) {
        try { return JSON.parse(cleaned.slice(start, i + 1)); } catch { start = -1; }
      }
    }
  }
  return null;
}