profit f4be27a879
Some checks failed
lakehouse/auditor 1 blocking issue: cloud: claim not backed — "the proven escalation ladder with learning context, collects"
auditor: fix two false-positive classes from cloud inference
Observed on PR #8 audit (de11ac4): 7 warn findings, all from the
cloud inference check. Investigation showed two distinct bug classes
that weren't "ship bad code", they were "auditor misreads the diff":

1. Cloud flagged "X not defined in this diff / missing implementation"
   for symbols like `tailJsonl` and `stubFinding` that ARE defined —
   just not in the added lines of this diff. Fix: extract candidate
   symbols from the cloud's gap summary, grep the repo for their
   definitions (function/const/let/def/class/struct/enum/trait/fn).
   If every named symbol resolves, drop the finding; if some do,
   demote to info with the resolution in evidence.

2. Cloud flagged runtime metrics like "58 cloud calls, 306s
   end-to-end" as unbacked claims. These are empirical outputs
   from running the test, not things a static diff can prove.
   Fix: claim_parser now has an `empirical` strength class
   matching iteration counts, cloud-call counts, duration metrics,
   attempt counts, tier-count phrases. Inference drops empirical
   claims from its cloud prompt (verifiable[] subset only) and
   claim-index mapping uses verifiable[] so cloud responses still
   line up.

Added `claims_empirical` to audit metrics so the verdict is
introspectable: how many claims WERE runtime-only vs how many
are diff-verifiable?

Verified: unit tests confirm empirical classification on 5
sample commit messages; symbol resolver found both false-positive
symbols (tailJsonl + stubFinding) and correctly skipped a known-
fake symbol.
2026-04-22 21:40:03 -05:00
..

Lakehouse Claim Auditor

A Bun sub-agent that watches open PRs on Gitea, reads the ship-claims in commit messages and PR bodies, and hard-blocks merges when the code doesn't back the claim.

Rationale: when "compiles + one curl works" gets called "phase shipped," placeholder code accumulates. This auditor runs every 90s, fetches each open PR, and subjects it to four checks:

  1. Static diff — grep/parse looking for placeholder patterns
  2. Dynamic — runs the never-before-executed hybrid test fixture
  3. Cloud inference — asks gpt-oss:120b via /v1/chat to identify gaps in the diff
  4. KB query — looks up data/_kb/ + observer for prior failure patterns on similar claims

Verdict is assembled, posted to Gitea as:

  • A failing commit status (hard block — branch protection prevents merge)
  • A review comment explaining every finding

Run manually

cd /home/profit/lakehouse
bun run auditor/index.ts

Defaults: polls every 90s, stops on auditor.paused file present.

State

  • data/_auditor/state.json — last-audited head SHA per PR
  • data/_auditor/verdicts/{pr}-{sha}.json — per-run verdict record
  • data/_kb/audit_lessons.jsonl — one row per block/warn finding, path-agnostic signature for dedup. Tailed by kb_query on each audit to surface recurring patterns (2+ distinct PRs with same signature → info, 3-4 → warn, 5+ → block). This is how the auditor learns.
  • data/_kb/scrum_reviews.jsonl — scrum-master per-file reviews. If a file in the current PR has been scrum-reviewed, kb_query surfaces the review as a finding with the accepted model and attempt count.

Where YOU edit

auditor/policy.ts — the verdict assembler. Controls which findings block vs warn vs inform. All other code is mechanical: fetching, running checks, posting to Gitea.

Hard-block mechanism

  1. Commit status is posted as failure with context lakehouse/auditor
  2. If main branch protection requires lakehouse/auditor status to pass, Gitea prevents merge
  3. When code is fixed and re-audit passes, status flips to success, merge unblocks

Enable branch protection (one-time, via Gitea UI or API):

  • POST /repos/profit/lakehouse/branch_protections
  • {"branch_name": "main", "required_status_checks": {"contexts": ["lakehouse/auditor"]}}