Methodology fix: gen_real_queries.go gains -offset N flag. Every prior real_NNN test sourced queries from rows 0-9 of fill_events.parquet (default -limit 10), so the substrate's published "8/10 cold-pass top-1 = judge-best" was measured on a memorized slice, not held-out data. real_006 samples 50 fresh rows (offset 10, never seen by the workers or ethereal_workers corpora). Same harness, same local qwen2.5:latest judge, same K=10. ~14 min wall total. Local-only, no cloud calls. Headline findings: - Cold-pass top-1 = judge-best (rank match): 41/50 (82%) vs real_001's 8/10 (80%) — substrate generalizes at rank level. - Strict (rating ≥ 2): 34/50 (68%) — 12-point drop from real_001's 80%. ~7 of 41 "no-discovery" queries had cold top-1 the judge rated 1; the corpus has gaps for some role-city combos in the v3 slice. - Verbatim lift: 9/9 discoveries → warm top-1 (clean, matches real_001 2/2) - Paraphrase recovery: 6/9 → top-1, 9/9 any-rank - Quality regressed: 3/50 — Q43 is the structural one Q43 (Packer at Midway Distribution / Chicago IL) regressed from rating 5 to rating 2 on warm pass with `warm_boosted_count=0` and `playbook_recorded=false`. Q18 (Shipping Clerks at the same client+city) recorded a playbook entry. The regression suggests Q18's recording leaked into Q43 via the warm-pass playbook corpus retrieval surface even though the role gate from real_002 should have blocked it. Three possible paths: extractor failed on one query, gate fires on boost path but not Shape B inject, or cosine drift puts the recorded worker close enough to Q43's embedding that warm-pass retrieval picks it up directly. Diagnosis is the next move. Three same-(client, city) clusters tested: - Heritage Foods Gary IN × 3 distinct roles: clean, distinct workers - Riverfront Steel Columbus OH × 4: cosine-level confusion (Q9/Q25 surface same worker w-281 for Assemblers vs Quality Techs at cold- pass), but no playbook bleed - Midway Distribution Chicago IL × 3: Q43 regression as above What this confirms: substrate works on the fresh distribution at the rank level, verbatim lift is real, paraphrase recovery is real. What this falsifies: real_002's role-gate fix is not structurally airtight. The bleed pattern can still fire under conditions the prior tests didn't reach. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
188 lines
7.8 KiB
Markdown
188 lines
7.8 KiB
Markdown
# Reality test real_006 — distribution-shift findings
|
||
|
||
**Run:** 2026-05-05 04:41:46 → 04:50:08 CDT (8m22s driver wall, ~14 min including ingest)
|
||
**Judge:** `qwen2.5:latest` (Ollama, local) — anchor's recommended judge, ~9s/query
|
||
**Queries:** 50 from `tests/reality/real_coord_queries_v3.txt` (rows 10-59 of fill_events.parquet, single `need` style)
|
||
**Corpora:** `workers,ethereal_workers` (5K + 10K)
|
||
**Local-only:** zero cloud calls per PRD line 70.
|
||
|
||
Companion to `playbook_lift_real_006.{json,md}`. That's the harness output; this is the reading.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Why this test exists
|
||
|
||
real_001-005 all sourced their queries from the **first 10 rows** of
|
||
`fill_events.parquet`. `gen_real_queries.go` had `-limit N` but no
|
||
`-offset N`, so every "real" reality test ran on the same memorized
|
||
slice. The published "8 / 10 cold-pass top-1 = judge-best" was a
|
||
property of those 10 rows, not measured generalization. real_006
|
||
closes the methodology gap: new `-offset` flag samples rows 10-59 (5×
|
||
the count, never seen by the substrate).
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Headline — substrate generalizes (mostly)
|
||
|
||
| Metric | real_001 (10 queries, rows 0-9) | real_006 (50 queries, rows 10-59) | Verdict |
|
||
|---|---:|---:|---|
|
||
| Cold-pass top-1 = judge-best (rank match) | 8 / 10 (80%) | **41 / 50 (82%)** | **HOLDS** |
|
||
| Cold-pass top-1 = judge-best AND rating ≥ 2 | 8 / 10 (80%) | 34 / 50 (68%) | -12 pts |
|
||
| Mean cold top-1 judge rating | ~3.3 | 3.08 | -7% |
|
||
| Discoveries (judge promoted non-top-1) | 2 / 10 | 9 / 50 (18%) | comparable |
|
||
| Verbatim lift (discovery → warm top-1) | 2 / 2 (100%) | 9 / 9 (100%) | **HOLDS** |
|
||
| Paraphrase recovery → top-1 | n/a (disabled) | 6 / 9 (67%) | new |
|
||
| Quality regressed on rejudge | 0 (test absent) | 3 / 50 (6%) | new |
|
||
|
||
**Reading:** the substrate's *rank* behavior generalizes cleanly — the
|
||
top-1 worker is judge-approved at the same rate on fresh data as on
|
||
memorized data. The *quality* of top-1 (rating ≥ 2) drops 12 points,
|
||
which means 7 of the 41 "no-discovery" queries had cold top-1 the
|
||
judge rated 1 (irrelevant) but the corpus had nothing better. Honest
|
||
signal: parts of the v3 slice are in territory the workers corpus
|
||
doesn't cover well.
|
||
|
||
The verbatim-lift property (discovery → warm top-1) is **clean at
|
||
9/9**, matching real_001's 2/2 perfectly. When the playbook records,
|
||
the recorded answer comes back next time. That's the load-bearing
|
||
learning property.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Cluster analysis — the cross-pollination question
|
||
|
||
real_001 found that same-(client, city) clusters cause Shape A boost
|
||
to bleed across roles. Real_002's role-gate fix (`roleEqual`) was
|
||
supposed to close that. real_006 has *more* cluster opportunities than
|
||
real_001 did:
|
||
|
||
| Cluster | Count | Result |
|
||
|---|---:|---|
|
||
| Riverfront Steel + Columbus OH | 4 | mostly clean — see below |
|
||
| Heritage Foods + Gary IN | 3 | **clean** — distinct workers per role, no boost firing |
|
||
| Cornerstone Fabrication + Louisville KY | 3 | clean |
|
||
| Midway Distribution + Chicago IL | 3 | **bleed: Q43 regressed** |
|
||
|
||
### Heritage Foods + Gary IN (3 queries, all clean)
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
Q14 Assemblers → e-1315
|
||
Q22 Material Handler → e-18
|
||
Q42 Machine Operator → e-1089
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
Three different roles → three different workers. Zero boosts fired,
|
||
zero playbooks recorded. **Role-disambiguation works at the cosine
|
||
level for this cluster.** Comparable to real_002's role-gate
|
||
demonstration.
|
||
|
||
### Riverfront Steel + Columbus OH (4 queries, partial)
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
Q9 Assemblers → w-281 (cold = warm, no boost)
|
||
Q25 Quality Techs → w-281 (cold = warm, no boost) ← same worker as Q9!
|
||
Q26 Machine Operator → w-4815 (clean)
|
||
Q32 Material Handler → e-8676 → w-2589 (judge promoted, playbook recorded)
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
Q9 and Q25 both surface `w-281` cold-pass for *different roles* —
|
||
that's a **cosine-level confusion** in the workers corpus, not a
|
||
playbook bleed. The substrate isn't breaking; the corpus contains a
|
||
worker whose resume embeds close to both "Assemblers" and "Quality
|
||
Techs" in this client+city. Judge-rating Q25 dropped 2 → 1 on
|
||
rejudge, which is the LLM's own consistency drift, not a substrate
|
||
fault. Worth noting but not a bug.
|
||
|
||
### Midway Distribution + Chicago IL (3 queries) — the regression
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
Q18 Shipping Clerks → cold w-4504 → warm w-1522 (boost=1, playbook recorded)
|
||
Q19 Machine Operators → cold = warm e-1251 (clean)
|
||
Q43 Packer → cold e-7746 (rating 5) → warm w-279 (rating 2) ← regressed
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Q43 regressed from rating 5 (perfect match) to rating 2 (weak)
|
||
even though `warm_boosted_count=0` and `playbook_recorded=false`.**
|
||
Same query, different warm top-1, no boost flag set. The playbook
|
||
recording from Q18 (Shipping Clerks at Midway/Chicago) reaches Q43
|
||
(Packer at Midway/Chicago) — same client+city, different role —
|
||
through the playbook corpus retrieval surface, even though the role
|
||
gate exists.
|
||
|
||
This is the **same pattern real_001 surfaced** (Q5/Q10 demoted by
|
||
Q2's playbook), and the role-gate fix from real_002 (`roleEqual`
|
||
on `Role` field) was supposed to close it. Possible explanations:
|
||
|
||
1. Role extractor failed on either Q18 ("Shipping Clerks") or Q43
|
||
("Packer") — leaving an empty role bypasses the gate (gate is
|
||
"permissive on empty" by design)
|
||
2. Gate fires on boost path but not on Shape B inject path — and
|
||
"boost=0" in the JSON is `warm_boosted_count` (count of
|
||
re-ranked entries), not a flag for "no playbook influence at all"
|
||
3. Cosine-level drift: the playbook entry just happens to be close
|
||
enough to Q43 in raw cosine space that warm-pass retrieval picks
|
||
up `w-279` directly without going through boost or inject
|
||
|
||
The other regressions (Q4 Centennial Packaging Flint MI, Q25 above)
|
||
are smaller (3→2 and 2→1) and likely judge consistency drift on
|
||
borderline candidates. Q43 is the structural one.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## What this confirms vs falsifies
|
||
|
||
**Confirmed:**
|
||
- Substrate generalizes at the rank level (82% cold-top-1 = judge-best)
|
||
- Verbatim lift works (9/9 discoveries → warm top-1)
|
||
- Role-disambiguation works at cosine level for clean role-distinct
|
||
query distributions (Heritage Foods cluster is the proof)
|
||
- Paraphrase recovery is real (6/9 → top-1, 9/9 any-rank)
|
||
|
||
**Falsified / weakened:**
|
||
- "8/10 cold-pass top-1 = judge-best" was 12 points optimistic on
|
||
the strict (rating ≥ 2) interpretation. Real number on broader
|
||
data is ~68%, not 80%. Headline rank-match number (82%) holds.
|
||
- Real_002's role-gate fix is **not structurally airtight**. Q43
|
||
shows the cluster-bleed pattern can still fire under conditions
|
||
the prior tests didn't reach. Open question: which path is
|
||
leaking — extractor failure, gate scope, or cosine drift?
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Next moves (informed by this evidence)
|
||
|
||
1. **Diagnose Q43 specifically**: re-run the role extractor on its
|
||
query text, check whether Q18's playbook entry has a role field
|
||
recorded, look at the warm-pass top-K to see whether `w-279`
|
||
reaches there via boost, inject, or cosine-only.
|
||
2. **Strengthen the corpus for the role-city combos that scored
|
||
low rating** (the 7 queries where cold top-1 was rating=1). The
|
||
workers corpus has gaps the v3 slice surfaced.
|
||
3. **Don't ship the "80% generalizes" framing as-is.** The number
|
||
real_006 measured (82% rank, 68% rating ≥ 2) is the honest one
|
||
to publish.
|
||
|
||
This is what reality tests are for. Numbers from the memorized slice
|
||
gave a clean story; numbers from the held-out slice show where it
|
||
needs work.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Repro
|
||
|
||
```bash
|
||
cd /home/profit/golangLAKEHOUSE
|
||
PATH=/usr/local/go/bin:$PATH go build -o bin/gen_real_queries ./scripts/cutover/gen_real_queries.go
|
||
./bin/gen_real_queries -limit 50 -offset 10 -styles need > tests/reality/real_coord_queries_v3.txt
|
||
|
||
PATH=/usr/local/go/bin:$PATH \
|
||
RUN_ID=real_006 \
|
||
JUDGE_MODEL=qwen2.5:latest \
|
||
QUERIES_FILE=tests/reality/real_coord_queries_v3.txt \
|
||
WITH_PARAPHRASE=1 \
|
||
WITH_REJUDGE=1 \
|
||
bash scripts/playbook_lift.sh
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
Local-only. No cloud calls.
|