root 4da32ad102 embedd: bump default to nomic-embed-text-v2-moe (475M MoE, 768d drop-in)

Local Ollama has three embedding models loaded:
  nomic-embed-text:latest        137M  768d  (previous default)
  nomic-embed-text-v2-moe:latest 475M  768d  (this commit's default)
  qwen3-embedding:latest         7.6B  4096d (would require dim change)

v2-moe is a drop-in upgrade — same 768 dim, 3.5× more params, MoE
architecture. Workers index doesn't need rebuilding, just future ingests
embed with the stronger model.

Run #005 result on the multi-coord stress suite:

  Diversity (same-role-across-contracts): 0.080 → 0.000 (n=9)
    → MoE is more discriminating: zero worker overlap across
      Milwaukee / Indianapolis / Chicago for shared role names.
      The geo + cert + skill context fully separates worker pools.
  Different-roles-same-contract: 0.013 → 0.036 (still ~96% diff)
  Determinism: 1.000 (unchanged)
  Verbatim handover: 4/4 (100%)
  Paraphrase handover: 4/4 (100%)

  200-worker swap: Jaccard 0.000 (unchanged — still perfect)

  Fresh-resume verify: STILL doesn't surface fresh workers in top-8.
    With v2-moe, distances increased (top-1 = 0.43–0.65 vs v1's 0.25–0.39)
    — the embedder is MORE discriminating, but the fresh worker's
    vector still doesn't outrank the 8th-best existing worker. Now
    suspect of being an HNSW post-build add issue (coder/hnsw
    incremental adds can land in hard-to-reach graph regions, not an
    embedder problem). Better embedder didn't fix it; needs a
    different strategy: full index rebuild after fresh adds, or
    explicit playbook-layer score boost for fresh workers, or
    hybrid (keyword + semantic) retrieval. Phase 3 investigation.

Cost: ingest is ~5× slower (workers 20s→100s; ethereal 35s→112s).
Acceptable for the quality jump on diversity. Real production with
incremental ingest won't pay this once-per-deploy.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-04-30 08:26:52 -05:00

3.7 KiB

Raw Blame History

Multi-Coordinator Stress Test — Run 005

Generated: 2026-04-30T13:25:15.497712275Z Coordinators: alice / bob / carol (each with own playbook namespace: playbook_alice / playbook_bob / playbook_carol) Contracts: alpha_milwaukee_distribution / beta_indianapolis_manufacturing / gamma_chicago_construction Corpora: workers,ethereal_workers K per query: 8 Total events captured: 61 Evidence: reports/reality-tests/multi_coord_stress_005.json

Diversity — is the system locking into scenarios or cycling?

Metric	Mean Jaccard	n pairs	Interpretation
Same role across different contracts	0	9	Lower = more diverse (different region/cert mix → different workers)
Different roles within same contract	0.03610093610093609	18	Should be near-zero (different roles = different worker pools)

Healthy ranges:

Same role across contracts: < 0.30 means the system is genuinely picking different workers per region/contract.
Different roles same contract: < 0.10 means role-specific retrieval is working.
If either is > 0.50, the system is "cycling" the same handful of workers regardless of query intent.

Determinism — same query reissued, top-K stability

Metric	Value
Mean Jaccard on retrieval-only reissue	1
Number of reissue pairs	12

Interpretation:

≥ 0.95: HNSW retrieval is highly deterministic; reissues land on near-identical top-K. Good — system locks into a stable view of "best workers for this query."
0.80 – 0.95: Some HNSW or embed variance, acceptable.
< 0.80: Retrieval is unstable — reissues see substantially different results, suggesting either embed nondeterminism (Ollama returning slightly different vectors) or vectord nondeterminism (HNSW insertion order affecting recall).

Learning — handover hit rate

Bob takes Alice's contract using Alice's playbook namespace. Did Alice's recorded answers surface in Bob's results?

Metric	Value
Verbatim handover queries run	4
Alice's recorded answer at Bob's top-1 (verbatim)	4
Alice's recorded answer in Bob's top-K (verbatim)	4
Verbatim handover hit rate (top-1)	1
Paraphrase handover queries run	4
Alice's recorded answer at Bob's top-1 (paraphrase)	4
Alice's recorded answer in Bob's top-K (paraphrase)	4
Paraphrase handover hit rate (top-1)	1

Interpretation:

Verbatim hit rate ≈ 1.0: trivial case — Bob runs identical queries; should always hit.
Paraphrase hit rate ≥ 0.5: institutional memory survives wording change — the harder learning property.
Paraphrase hit rate ≈ 0.0: Bob's paraphrases drift past the inject threshold, so Alice's recordings don't activate. Same caveat as the playbook_lift paraphrase pass.

Per-event capture

All matrix.search responses live in the JSON — top-K with worker IDs, distances, and per-corpus counts. Search by phase:

jq '.events[] | select(.phase == "merge")' reports/reality-tests/multi_coord_stress_005.json
jq '.events[] | select(.coordinator == "alice" and .phase == "baseline")' reports/reality-tests/multi_coord_stress_005.json
jq '.events[] | select(.role == "warehouse worker") | {phase, contract, top_k_ids: [.top_k[].id]}' reports/reality-tests/multi_coord_stress_005.json

What's NOT in this run (Phase 1 deliberately defers)

48-hour clock. Events fire as discrete steps, not on a timeline.
Email / SMS ingest. No endpoints exist on the Go side yet.
New-resume injection mid-run. The corpus is fixed at the start.
Langfuse traces. Need Go-side wiring.

These are Phase 2/3. The Phase 1 substrate is what the time-based runner will mount on top of.

3.7 KiB Raw Blame History Unescape Escape