Three artifacts in one PR:
1. docs/PYTHON_INVENTORY.md — every .py file in the repo classified:
Production (sidecar routers + 3 systemd services), Documented
(kb_measure, kb_staffer_report), Manual (one-off tools), Dead
(sidecar/sidecar/lab_ui.py + pipeline_lab.py are genuinely
not imported anywhere).
2. docs/COHESION_INTEGRATION_PLAN.md — the "smarter DB" loop J
called out as missing. Six phases A-F. Phase A ships here; B-F
are named + sequenced for follow-up PRs. Each phase adds ONE
wire of the loop; no single PR does them all.
3. Phase A wire (auditor verdicts → observer + KB):
- auditor/audit.ts: after assembleVerdict, fire-and-forget POST
to :3800/event with source="auditor" AND append to
data/_kb/outcomes.jsonl with kind="audit". Errors log + drop
— the verdict is still on disk at _auditor/verdicts/.
- mcp-server/observer.ts: extend source union to include
"auditor" | "bot" (was "mcp" | "scenario" only, which silently
coerced my first auditor POST to source="scenario"). Accept
body.ok OR body.success. Accept body.audit_duration_ms as a
fallback for duration_ms. Uses body.one_liner as
output_summary when set.
Live-verified after observer restart:
re-audit PR #6 → verdict=request_changes, 4 findings (1 warn)
observer: by_source={'auditor': 1} (previously coerced to 'scenario')
_kb/outcomes.jsonl tail: kind=audit sig=pr6-7fe47bab
pr=6 overall=request_changes
The shape of the loop is now visible to downstream consumers. Phase
B (auditor's kb_query check reads these audit rows for history)
lands in a follow-up PR. Phase C-F similar.
NOT in this PR:
- Actually deleting lab_ui.py + pipeline_lab.py (operator decision,
called out in the inventory doc)
- Cleaning up the 5 overlapping Python scripts (same)
- Phases B-F of the cohesion plan (separate PRs per wire)
- Integration test that asserts "smarter DB" across runs (Phase F)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
6.5 KiB
Cohesion integration plan — the "smarter DB" loop
Written: 2026-04-22, after J flagged that the system has good parts but they don't compose into the self-improving loop promised in the control-plane thesis (project_control_plane_thesis.md memory: 0→85% via hyperfocus-then-escalate).
The gap
Each piece works in isolation. What's not wired:
┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐
│ observer │──✓──│ data/_kb/ │──?──│ auditor │
│ :3800 │ │ outcomes. │ │ kb_query │
│ │ │ jsonl │ │ check │
└─────────────┘ └─────────────┘ └─────────────┘
▲ │
│? ▼
┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐
│ auditor │─────│ data/_audit │ │ cloud │
│ verdicts │ │or/verdicts/ │ │ inference │
│ │ │ │ │ │
└─────────────┘ └─────────────┘ └─────────────┘
│?
▼
┌─────────────┐
│ hybrid_srch │
│ playbook_mem│
│ context7 │
└─────────────┘
- ✓ solid: observer captures scenarios, writes
_kb/outcomes.jsonl. - ? missing:
- auditor verdicts go to
_auditor/verdicts/— not to observer or KB - auditor kb_query reads
_kb/outcomes.jsonlbut doesn't query hybrid_search, playbook_memory, or context7 - auditor inference sends claim+diff to cloud — but WITHOUT KB neighbors, WITHOUT drift context, WITHOUT tool-aware retrieval
- auditor verdicts go to
- Result: every audit is stateless-ish. The DB doesn't get smarter across audits.
The target loop
PR opened
↓
auditor fetches diff + claims
↓
auditor enriches with:
— KB neighbors: past verdicts on similar claim-hashes
— hybrid_search: playbooks for task classes the diff touches
— context7 drift status: for any tool named in commit messages
— MCP tools: agent-style queries if relevant
↓
cloud inference sees: diff + claims + enrichment
↓
verdict posted to Gitea
↓
verdict ALSO persisted to:
— observer :3800/event (source=auditor)
— _kb/outcomes.jsonl (kind=audit, sig_hash=pr+sha)
↓
next audit on similar PR:
— KB neighbors find this prior verdict
— cloud sees "similar PRs ended in request_changes for reason X"
— verdict is more calibrated
Phases of closure
Building this in order from least-invasive:
Phase A — Verdict indexing (shipped in this PR)
After every auditPr() completes, in addition to persisting to _auditor/verdicts/:
- POST the verdict to observer
:3800/eventwithsource: "auditor",ok: verdict === "approve",event_kind: "audit",sig_hash: <stable hash of pr_number + head_sha>. - Append a simplified outcome to
data/_kb/outcomes.jsonlwith a specialkind: "audit"row so the KB surface treats audits alongside scenarios.
Minimal surgery. Doesn't change the verdict itself. Just makes it visible to downstream consumers.
Test: after this PR lands, re-run the auditor once; observer stats should show by_source.auditor > 0; _kb/outcomes.jsonl should have one new row per audited SHA.
Phase B — KB query sees auditor history
Extend auditor/checks/kb_query.ts to:
- Read
_kb/outcomes.jsonl, filterkind === "audit", find prior audits with matchingsig_hash(same PR across SHAs) or similar claim hashes. - Emit finding: "prior N audits on this PR ended in [approve, block, request_changes], last reason was X."
Gives the auditor memory across re-audits of the same PR.
Phase C — Hybrid search in kb_query
When a PR touches crates/vectord/src/playbook_memory.rs (task-class matching), auditor calls POST /vectors/hybrid to find playbooks semantically related to the diff. Surfaces as "N playbooks in production rely on this code path, consider backward-compat."
Requires:
- Task-class extractor from diff paths
- Cloud-free hybrid_search call (we have local Ollama for embeddings)
Phase D — Context7 drift awareness in auditor
If the diff / commit message names a tool that's in any playbook's doc_refs, auditor calls the context7 bridge to check current drift status. Surfaces as "tool X has drifted since N playbooks referenced it; this PR may need to update those."
Phase E — Inference sees enrichment
The cloud inference check currently sends diff + claims. Extend to send diff + claims + kb_neighbors + drift_context + hybrid_search_matches. The prompt becomes context-rich — exactly what makes the cloud model competent (per the control-plane thesis).
Phase F — Full integration test
An auditor self-test that:
- Creates a synthetic PR with known-good and known-bad claims
- Runs the enriched auditor
- Asserts the verdict found the planted issues
- Runs a second identical-claim PR
- Asserts the SECOND verdict references the FIRST audit (via KB neighbor retrieval)
- "Smarter DB" proof: two runs, measurable context gain.
Sequence
Phase A lands in this PR alongside the inventory. Phases B-F are follow-up PRs, each with their own auditor gate. Order matters: A → B (reads A's output) → C+D (in parallel) → E (consumes B/C/D) → F (asserts E's behavior).
Not in this plan (deliberate)
- Rewriting the auditor to use a different architecture. Current 4-check model stays; we just enrich the checks.
- Tuning cloud inference precision. The false-positive rate is a prompt-engineering concern; this plan is about context enrichment, which is separate.
- Branch protection enforcement. Stays off until Phase F passes.
The overall bet: this is the "putting it all together coherently" J said was a real problem. Six phases over however many PRs it takes. Each one ships one wire of the loop; no single PR tries to do them all.